

A Fan is not a rational being
By: Tom | May 23rd, 2007I’ve been hesitant to call for Dave Sarachan’s dismissal thus far. I’ve had moments, like after a 1,000 mile trip to Toronto to see schoolboy soccer, when I’ve leaned that way; then in the cold light of day, a former MLS executive convinced me to wait and see.
And of course, thanks to MLS’ absurd (if perhaps necessary at this stage of its existence) structure, it doesn’t even matter much what the Fire’s record is at this point. They can be less than mediocre the rest of the year and still crawl into the playoffs. At that point, they can then merrily state they were just a couple of games from the MLS Cup final, whatever their overall record or dismal play.
The second consequence of MLS having no relegation and a very generous playoff system is that the Fire’s season only really begins when Blanco’s season begins. How we can judge their team and roster now when over half their payroll is going to a player not even here yet?
These are the logical facts. However, I’m not an MLS executive, nor a journalist (at least not on this blog); I’m a fan. Being a fan of an MLS team is an entirely illogical thing to be. Indeed, MLS would not even exist were it not for the mad passions of the few diehards that keep teams like the Fire in business. All sports depend on the irrational love, hate and blind insanity of supporters.
Journalists and MLS executives get paid to make the right, rational judgments. But I don’t. And I, for one, am sick of insipid football and poor results - hell, I didn’t even enjoy it much when the Fire started the season playing mediocre football and scraping out a few results. If you’re going to play dull, defensive soccer you have to win games. The Fire must win at least one of their two games in the next five days. Red Bulls away is a tough game, admittedly. But Real Salt Lake at home has to be a victory if they come back empty-handed from New York.
Three other rational and irrational reasons why:
(1) Gaining less than three points from two games could conceivably plummet us towards the bottom of the standings. With Toronto FC having turned things around, and DC United surely better than their record, only the sorry Crew look like a sure bet to finish below the Fire if we come out with little from the next two games. Even the prospect of not making the playoffs, in this league, is unacceptable for the Chicago Fire.
(2) The Fire are trying to draw new fans this season, having invested more than anyone else in MLS apart from the Galaxy in one player, with a key reason being Blanco’s ability to bring out new fans to Toyota Park. The Fire have also leveraged the Beckham game, with tickets not sold individually, to bring out new fans to other games as well. Some of these potential Fire supporters are already attending games. Are we going to win their loyalty beyond Beckham and Blanco by playing terrible football and losing games? Probably not.
(3) If there are two teams I have an irrational hatred for in MLS, it’s Real Salt Lake and the New York Red Bulls. Their names are abysmal. I’m not particularly opposed to the American tradition of having official team nicknames, but let’s make them good ones with a connection to the history of the city (like, obviously, the Fire).
We have to win at least one of these games, and preferably not embarrass ourselves in the other. Otherwise, I’ll be heading over to Bigsoccer and catching a ride on the Fire Dave Sarachan bandwagon.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Here’s a funny thing: I lead my summaries of Week 7 with a rather rambling argument as to why Chicago shouldn’t worry: it involves a quick look at the team who beat them last week, FC Dallas.
Like you, I think the playoff structure is silly for how it rather cheaply allows MLS teams to declare a putrid season a success; against that, though, there’s no spinning failure to make the playoffs as anything but failure of the purest sort. But that same structure also means it takes more than a slip to miss out - and that’s the silver lining for the Fire.
By way of, um, full disclosure, I feel I ought to mention I did pick the Fire to miss out this year….
Posted from
United States

-



Jeff, why did you pick the Fire to miss out? Coaching, personnel? I still feel that a forward line of Rolfe, Mapp and Blanco will score goals, and the Fire have plenty of defensive midfielders to shore things up behind them. But they’ll have to defend better than they have recently, that’s for sure, and Blanco is a wild card.
Posted from
United States

-



I see it as a personnel problem - and don’t think that Blanco will be enough to save them. I think it’s a combination of age up the middle (Gutierrez and Armas just don’t have the legs anymore) and, much as I think this opinion is limited to me, the loss of Jaqua matters; they lost a big body for knocking in goals off penalty-area scrums, not to mention for simple headed goals.
But the bigger problem is an aging central midfield. And this was SO striking in the losses to New England and Toronto; often as not the Fire defense faced equal number counter-attacks, which twisted their shape when defenders had to shift to cover individual breakdowns - hence the wide-open shots and lost marks. Basically, they can’t chase well enough to chase a game and it’s killing them.
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed













